Store Decides To Integrate Boys’ And Girls’ Toys; Apocalypse Ensues

stfusexists:

cassket:

A UK toy store has eliminated its girls’ and boys’ toys sections, instead grouping toys by category. A blogger has claimed this decision as a victory, but the store says it’s just responding to customer confusion.

According to the Mirror, the toy store Hamleys has replaced its pink and blue signs with red and white ones, and changed its organization to group toys by “interest and type” rather than by the gender that’s supposed to play with them. Blogger Laura Nelson writes that the change is a response to her campaign — she says she contacted Hamleys PR office as well as its parent company, expressing “my concern that the layout of the toyshop restricts children’s and parents’ choices and contributes to our society’s inequality.” Now, she says, “the campaign worked!” She concludes,

Congratulations everyone! We still have work to do on the nature of the toys themselves, and the gender stereotyping of their marketing […] but we have come to a milestone. Great work!

The store, however, says Nelson’s efforts weren’t behind the changes. A spokesman tells the Mirror,

While we welcome comments from all customers and interested parties on improving Hamleys, in this case we regret that the changes to our signage were not due to any campaign. We are in the process of detailed planning for a complete refit of our store on Regent Street. As part of this planning, it was made clear to us from consultants and customer surveys that our store directional signage was confusing. As a result we commenced changing all our signage in October of this year in order to improve customer flow.

I’m inclined to believe them, if only because businesses are more likely to change due to customer demand than to ideological appeals. Whatever the cause, the changes seem smart, and helpful to parents and kids who might want to choose toys based on what they do rather than who they’re allegedly for. However, not everyone agrees. Toby Young writes on his Telegraphblog,

[N]ature will always trump nurture and any attempt to re-educate children so they grow up to be model citizens in some socialist utopia is bound to fail. […] Henceforth, dads looking for Scalextric and mums searching for My Little Pony will just have to wander aimlessly around the shop’s five floors until they stumble across them. Most, I imagine, will give up and go home.

Yes, with the demise of gender labeling, the only solution for parents will be to stop buying toys altogether. It will be completely impossible to, say, seek out the My Little Pony section of the store for their My Little Pony needs. And what if, transfixed with confusion and terror, a parent accidentally purchases a dinosaur for his or her little girl? Clearly this socialist assault on her natural, inborn desires for a pink plastic horse with a graphic on its butt will forever warp her sense of self. Someone must stand up for the children of Britain before it’s too late!

My favorite part of that guy’s comment on this is that he really thinks that boys playing with trucks and girls playing with My Little Ponies has ANYTHING to do with nature. Uhh…since neither of those things existed a few thousand years ago, friend-o, I’m pretty sure that’s not how evolution works.

  1. greatestpossiblehappiness reblogged this from stfusexists
  2. rantingnraging reblogged this from stfusexists
  3. yayfeminism reblogged this from stfusexists
  4. thegreatnessideserve reblogged this from thesexuneducated
  5. kwveyn reblogged this from baconisbetterthanbacon
  6. musicspeakswhenwordscannot reblogged this from cleverchaussette
  7. diverse-distractions reblogged this from stfusexists
  8. andywear reblogged this from sinidentidades
  9. sinidentidades reblogged this from anirishginger
  10. telmar3 reblogged this from thesexuneducated and added:
    My favorite part is that he thinks that this has anything to do with socialism. Where the hell did you get that?! LeBron...
  11. snurri reblogged this from knownforms
  12. knownforms reblogged this from baconisbetterthanbacon
  13. nectarinesubmarines reblogged this from stfusexists
  14. xcoughsyrup reblogged this from xyrophile
  15. stephorny reblogged this from hannahisawful
  16. xyrophile reblogged this from stfusexists
  17. tragiclikebowie reblogged this from baconisbetterthanbacon
  18. notforked reblogged this from baconisbetterthanbacon
  19. curiouslyhigh reblogged this from baconisbetterthanbacon and added:
    lol my husband and I were just debating gender stereotypes and gender biases re: toys last night and this morning. My...
  20. isopycnic reblogged this from stfusexists
  21. baconisbetterthanbacon reblogged this from stfusexists
  22. awesomethatisstuff reblogged this from stfusexists
  23. beingatoaster reblogged this from porygons
  24. thewordfountain reblogged this from stfusexists
  25. mycat-tibby reblogged this from stfusexists
  26. ana-coluthia reblogged this from hannahisawful and added:
    My god this man has an atrocious rebuttal. And the comments are ridiculous. One guy is going on about how typical it is...
  27. quantumstarlight reblogged this from stfusexists and added:
    My favorite part of his comment was how he assumes only dads buy presents for sons and moms buy presents for daughters....